Grid Connection Feasibility Study
for Developers and Investors

Pursuing an unviable site may only cost £thousands in wasted site acquisition resource, but the opportunity cost – backing a winner elsewhere – will be £millions

ENERGY STORAGE

Where Roadnight Taylor can help

By avoiding unviable sites you’ll:

  • Save on in-house and external site finder costs

  • Save on failed connection application fees

  • Save on legal and professional fees

  • Free up cash and resource to focus on viable sites

By focusing on viable sites you’ll:

  • Accept more connection offers

  • Enter into more option agreements

  • Achieve planning consent on more sites

  • Reach financial close on more schemes

The difference in numbers:

  • More than 2.5GW of viable connection offers per annum

  • >80% of connection offers accepted

  • Hundreds of wasted applications avoided

  • Five times the application success rate of the market

The technical, commercial or regulatory key that will unlock the grid at transmission or distribution level – and so the potential in a site – is often obscured from all but those with the very deepest of expertise.  Finding it can be worth £millions.

The technical, commercial or regulatory key that will unlock  the grid – and so the potential in a site – is often obscured from all but those with the very deepest of expertise.  Finding it can be worth £millions.

The challenge

  • Nationally, about 15% of HV and EHV generation connection offers are accepted by developers, in part because:

  • Many applications are submitted on the wrong part of the network because:

    • developers rely on network operators’ heat maps; and
    • developers rely on budget estimates; but
    • heat maps and budget estimates give as many false positives as they do false negatives

  • As frequently, the wrong application is submitted on the right part of the network

  • DNO System Planners have neither the time nor the authority to find and advise you of a connection solution – pre application – in spite of most having the inclination

  • It stands to reason that System Planners would not all have the combination of technical, commercial and regulatory expertise and experience – and the tenacity – to consistently identify a technically feasible and cost-viable connection

The solution

What we do

Working at both transmission and distribution levels, we carry out a thorough, skilled, detailed and efficient study of publicly-available network data in order to rapidly deduce whether a technically-feasible and commercially-viable connection can be achieved – and, as appropriate, liaise with the relevant network operator’s System Planner to augment our study and gain additional network intelligence.

Short of carrying out a feasibility study for many £thousands – and in a timeframe that works for few serious developers  – DNO and TO System Planners are unable to do this work.  Few developers, if any, have the necessary in-house capability to deliver the requisite results.

Our feasibility studies are trusted and valued by a rollcall of the UK’s leading energy scheme developers – the smart money. Some leading developers have built substantial pipelines via our feasibility service.

Jake Dunn

“Roadnight Taylor’s specialist engineers have carried out a number of feasibility studies for Vattenfall’s schemes, giving us an incredibly high success-rate.

Significantly, for me, is their ability to take our vision and commercial creativity, and deliver viable, sophisticated connection solutions for complex, multi-technology colocation projects (wind, solar, storage and hydrogen electrolysis). They are extraordinary.”

Jake Dunn, leading UK expert in co-location 
Commercial Development Manager, Vattenfall Wind Power

Who does the work?

Our extraordinary team of Connectologists® have the hands-on technical, commercial and regulatory experience of the highest order – having held responsibility for many thousands of EHV offers and applications.  They are tenacious, diligent, self-assured and professional – and they are on your side.

Pete Aston

Pete Aston
Specialist Connections Engineer

Catherine Cleary

Catherine Cleary
Specialist Connections Engineer

Philip Bale - Roadnight Taylor

Philip Bale
Specialist Connections Engineer

–

Some of our current developer feasibility study projects

  • Guest podcast Alex Ikonic, Project Commitment fee

This podcast discussed the evolving Project Commitment Fee (PCF) with special guest Alex Ikonic, Grid Engineer at Ørsted, who brings insights from the CMP448 CUSC work group.

  • Gate 2 evidence submissions Q&A

With the window now open for Distribution projects and the latest ENA and network-specific guidance available, this second webinar was a further opportunity to gain insights needed for successful Gate 2 evidence submissions.

  • Distribution, milestone, intolerance and a green light for smaller projects

A podcast on how not meeting new queue milestones—like the 2-month planning deadline—could get your project dropped. Plus projects under 5MW in England & Wales may now skip TIAs under CMP446

  • Gate 2 evidence submissions Q&A

Webinar Watch: Join us for our second webinar on Gate 2 evidence submissions. This time it is a live Q&A webinar.

  • EREP130 battery storage

A podcast focusing on the application of Engineering Recommendation EREP130 to embedded battery storage connections under Technical Limits scenarios. Is it appropriate for DNOs to enforce EREP130 clauses when offering early connections under technical limits? And what does it mean for customers?

  • Gate 2 Submissions webinar

Join over 450 people who registered - and us - for a timely webinar designed to bring clarity to the Gate 2 submission process for energy project developers and stakeholders.